Q: Most Bible teachers believe in verbal plenary inspiration, which is the inspiration of the Scripture down to the very words, and the original manuscripts there’s no errors—scientifically, mathematically, anything like that. What about holding to a different position, like the view that has been held by theologians like Karl Barth, that Scripture is completely inspired but some of it, when it comes to history or certain scientific facts, can contain error in the original manuscripts?
Hank Hanegraaff: If you look at the words of Peter, he says: “Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation. For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit” (2 Pet. 1:20-21, NIV).
The one thing we can say about the Bible is that it’s fully divine and fully human yet without error in its autographs. This is to say, if God is God, and God is speaking through the personalities and proclivities of people, He is speaking truth through them. Therefore, if you read Peter and you read Moses, you’ll find two different writing styles. Now, why would the Holy Spirit in that process communicate error through people?
What we must do is learn to read the Bible for all its worth. In Genesis, for example, when you see a snake deceiving Eve, Moses writing long after the creation event is not intending to say “Satan looks like a snake,” or “Satan has physical characteristics,” or “a snake has vocal chords.” No. He is not telling us what Satan looks like he’s telling what Satan is like. Satan, of course, is non-corporeal—nonphysical.
We have to understand the art and science of biblical interpretation and then we’re not going to come off and say, “You know what, the Bible has some nice things to say, but overall it makes some pretty big errors.” Instead, we’ll say, “Whoa, my error was in that I didn’t know how to read the Bible for all its worth.”
For further related study, please see the following:
How Do We Know the Bible is Divine Rather than Human in Origin? (Hank Hanegraaff)
L-I-G-H-T-S to the Word of God (Hank Hanegraaff)
Practical Hermeneutics: How to Interpret Your Bible Correctly (Part 1) (Thomas Howe)
Practical Hermeneutics: How to Interpret Your Bible Correctly (Part 2) (Thomas Howe)
Taming Bible “Discrepancies” (Rachel Ramer)
Presumed Innocent Until Proven Guilty (H. Wayne House)
What Does it Mean to Interpret the Bible Literally? (Hank Hanegraaff)
When Literal Interpretations Don’t Hold Water (John Makujina)
Was Eve Deceived by a Talking Snake? (Hank Hanegraaff)
Please also consult the following books:
Has God Spoken (B1045) by Hank Hanegraaff
The Complete Bible Answer Book Collector’s Edition Revised and Updated (B2027) by Hank Hanegraaff
The Origin of the Bible (B1089) edited by Philip W. Comfort
New International Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties (B106) by Gleason Archer
Blog adapted from “Do the original manuscripts of the Bible contain errors?”